If Adam had not eaten the forbidden fruit but had disallowed Eve’s action, as mentioned in Numbers 30:8, would humanity have avoided the fall

In the story of Genesis 3, Adam and Eve’s disobedience by eating the forbidden fruit marks the fall of humanity into sin. In this narrative, both Adam and Eve were directly involved in the act, but the consequences of their actions affected all of humanity. Adam, as the first man created and the head of the human race, was given the command by God not to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil (Genesis 2:16–17). Eve, who was created from Adam and was his helper, was deceived by the serpent and ate the fruit. Adam then ate as well, choosing to follow Eve rather than adhere to God's command.

However, Numbers 30:8 presents an interesting concept where a husband has the authority to annul the vow of his wife if he disagrees with her decision. Applying this principle to the story of Adam and Eve, one might ask: If Adam had exercised his authority over Eve, as described in Numbers 30:8, and stopped her from eating the fruit, would humanity have avoided the fall into sin?

This question is not just about examining what might have happened if Adam had made a different choice, but it also opens up a discussion about free will, authority, responsibility, and God’s sovereign plan for humanity. Would Adam’s intervention have been enough to reverse the consequences of sin?